🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “complete double standards” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The tobacco firm seeks modifications of a pending law that include decreasing the proposed size of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“As an elected official, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented the health advocate.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

The campaigner stated the letter was believed to have been distributed to several government departments and was in distribution within community advocacy networks.

Global industry interference concerns

This occurs during expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with health policies. In recent weeks, global health authorities raised concerns that the tobacco industry was escalating campaigns to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of corporate influence globally. Corporate signatures are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN international gathering,” commented the tobacco industry watchdog.

Likely impacts

“When public health regulation fails to be approved because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The tobacco control bill progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and requiring that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

In the letter, the corporation proposes this be reduced to less than half “according to global suggested parameters”, deferred for no less than one year after the bill passes.

International experts in fact recommends a warning should cover at least 50% of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the principal display areas as possible”. In the UK, warnings need to encompass nearly two-thirds of a product container sides.

Flavor restrictions debate

The company seeks the removal of broad restrictions on scented smoking items, arguing that it would push consumers toward “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The proposed legislation recommends punishments for different infractions “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to ten-year jail sentences”.

Company justification

Via documentation, the corporate leader of the Zambian branch says the firm is “committed to ethical business practices” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the associated health impact” but claims that “some regulations can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that multiple comparable regulations existed in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “complete contradiction”, he stated.

“We reside in a global village. Should I grow cigarettes in my back yard and collect the yield and market the products – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to benefit personally and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are dying … is in itself total emotional collapse.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had not caused companies to close, Chimbala said. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. It only protects the people.”

Official corporate statement

The corporate communicator commented: “The company operates its operations according with current country statutes. Moreover, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for stakeholder participation in regulation development.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, adding that minors should be safeguarded against access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We support evolving legislation to achieve intended population health targets, while recognizing the range of rights and obligations on corporations, customers and associated groups,” they said, noting that BAT’s proposals “represent the situation of the local commercial environment and cigarette sector, which involves growing volumes of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.