🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, star Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for playing Vladimir Putin in a new film. The movie, however, could coincide so closely with the carefully constructed version promoted by Russian state media that, domestically, it reads as a endorsement instead of a challenge.

The Manufactured Strongman

For years, the Russian political apparatus and the country's entertainment industry have worked together to craft a made-to-measure version of Putin. This figure is a political superhero devoid of flaws, an ex-intelligence officer reframed as a Russian James Bond who always knows beyond what he shows.

“Domestically, the manufactured Putin has long eclipsed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a television show released last October, directed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a fictional security officer inexplicably chosen to “rescue” the nation from chaos. Although the character's name Mikhail, the implication is unmistakable: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions frequently result in reinforcing this identical story instead of debunking it. An adaptation inspired by a popular book aims to subvert the Putin cult by framing him as a symptom but as a symptom, shifting the focus to the spin doctors around him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

In the film, the president is presented as having been chosen by powerful oligarchs to steady the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and practically plead him to take the top job. His response is that he would rather govern from the shadows, desiring permanent power.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. Historically, these events took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one actually pleaded with Putin to take the job. The position was in essence a casting call with many candidates. At the centre to this process stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who planned to control the state de facto.

• His list included several politicians, including an opposition leader later murdered and a security service director.
• Per a journalist who studied Putin’s biography, the future president merely met the required parameters: obedient, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer familiar with the process said the key criterion was controllability and loyalty, not leadership.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Experts agree that the image of Putin as a master operative was built after the fact. Stories about his clandestine activities in East Germany do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he was an administrator and routine duties, a mid-level functionary not engaged in field operations.

Curiously, the shift to depicting him as a “007” may in part have been triggered by the actor's arrival as James Bond. The grittier interpretation led Russian media and online audiences to make comparisons with Putin. Mashup posters replacing Craig’s face with Putin’s appeared on Moscow streets, fueling the increasing trend to see him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an star popular with viewers there, the Kremlin are likely to seize the chance to frame his casting as a small victory. Its omission of mass protests, the opposition, or prominent activists in the story, even though it includes recent years, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

Domestically, Putin is frequently an omnipotent figure who never appears directly. His influence is hinted at through portraits or orders from on high. Now, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally validate the very myths it might seek to question.